NZ$1m in donations from fast-track applicants revealed, RNZ finds
According to RNZ, people and businesses seeking fast-track approval for their projects donated almost exclusively to the National and NZ First parties. The donations totalled about NZ$1 million.

Political donations from people and companies seeking fast-track approval for their projects in New Zealand have come under scrutiny. According to RNZ, those donations went almost exclusively to the governing partners, the National and NZ First parties.
The donations, totalling about NZ$1 million, have reignited debate over the transparency of the accelerated approval mechanism and possible conflicts of interest. The fast-track process is designed to allow major infrastructure and development projects to be assessed more quickly.
Critics argue that the overlap between donations and applications could cast doubt on the impartiality of the process. The parties involved say the donations were made within the legal framework and that approval decisions are based on merit. These views are attributed to the respective parties.
More from Australia-Pacific

Aspiration has changed since the Howard era. This budget is finally catching up
Treasurer Jim Chalmers's 2026-27 budget proposes a sweeping reorientation of housing, childcare and education incentives. According to ABC analysis, the budget breaks with the middle-class identity of the John Howard era and refocuses on a younger generation of renting voters.

Australia's anti-corruption chief Brereton to face Senate grilling
National Anti-Corruption Commissioner Paul Brereton will face senators' questions at estimates hearings after his shock resignation on Monday. Calls are growing for a wider reset of the troubled agency.

Will drastic NDIS overhaul repeat the mistakes of the past?
Australia's planned overhaul of the National Disability Insurance Scheme is raising fears that the cuts could repeat the mistakes of the 1980s deinstitutionalisation wave. Advocates and health experts warn sudden changes could leave a serious care gap.